Keel v. Hainline
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
In this action, Patricia Ann Burge, a minor, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, obtained a judgment against Larry Jennings, Robert Keel, Harry Grove, A. C„ Saint III, Dick Polite, Jr., and Don Cummings, all of whom are minors, for damages for personal injury. Defendant Keel alone appeals.
As his first proposition of-error defendant asserts that the court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the evidence and his motion for a directed verdict because there was no evidence that the injury was willfully or intentionally inflicted or that the injury was the proximate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Rolater v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Vosburg v. PutneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Singer v. MarxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Adams v. WaggonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Caudle v. BettsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Boim v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.