Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Sommers

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2014No. 26720PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Roger Hamilton appeals summary judgment dismissing his claims of legal negligence or malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty brought against his former attorneys. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Background

[¶ 2.] This case began as a dispute related to 112 bee sites located in Marshall, Roberts, and Day counties in northeast South Dakota. In order to place bee hives onto private property, the hive owner must secure written permission from the landowner and file the permission slip with the South Dakota Department of Agriculture (Department). Here, the 112…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Big Stone Therapies, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Coffey v. CoffeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Zhi Gang Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Robinson-Podoll v. Harmelink, Fox, & Ravnsborg Law OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Zerfas v. AMCO Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API