Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Coffey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2016No. 27721PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Debra R.- Tech Coffey sought a divorce from Michael F. Coffey. They entered into a stipulation and agreement (Agreement) to resolve -all issues and divide their property and debt. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement awarded the marital home to Michael, divided responsibility for the two mortgages on the home, and declared that should 'the home be sold, the proceeds from the sale would first be used to pay off any sum remaining on the mortgages.

[¶2.] Michael sold the home in April 2015 and used the próceeds of the sale to pay off both mortgages. He requested reimbursement from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sazama v. State Ex Rel. MuilenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hogan & Associates Builders, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Eiden Construction, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company and Amco Insurance Company, an Iowa CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Johnson v. MarkveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Uhre Realty v. TronnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Helleberg v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Wilson v. MaynardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API