Legal Opinion

People v. Donaldson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the *750defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. WindhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. BowensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. AinorisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PadroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API