Legal Opinion
People v. Ainoris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The People satisfied their burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts necessary to establish that the defendant met the criteria of a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Lawless, 44 AD3d 738 [2007]; People v Hardy, 42 AD3d 487 [2007]).
It is uncontroverted that the defendant sexually abused his stepdaughter multiple times over a three-year period commencing when she was nine years old, as well as sexually abused two of her friends when they were 12 years old. On at least one occasion, the defendant sexually abused his stepdaughter’s friend…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. LawlessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. LynkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. PearsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. DonaldsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009