Legal Opinion

People v. Morales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*983Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated April 14, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court correctly determined that the People met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts that supported the defendant’s adjudication as a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Ruddy, 31 AD3d 517 [2006]; People v Perser, 29 AD3d 767 [2006]). The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. InghilleriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. FortinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. RuddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. BristerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. PensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API