Legal Opinion
People v. Padro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 17, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 9, 2009, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant failed to demonstrate that certain mitigating factors existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level two designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. DonaldsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Morel-BacaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. NewtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.