Legal Opinion
Hatchell v. Hebeisen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error irom the District Court of Kay County; before B. T. Iiainer, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Beauchamp, J.:
This is an action of unlawful detainer, to recover possession of the west one-half of the northeast quarter of section 28, north range 1, east Indian Meridian, Kay county.
On October 27, 189G, Arnold Hebeisen filed a homestead entry on the land in question. Frank Hatchell contested it, claiming to be a prior settler. The contest was decided by the land department in favor of Hatchell. Motion for review was denied, and Hebeisen’s homestead entry was canceled as a result thereof.
Hatchell was allowed to file on the land on December 12, 1899. Hebeisen then…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Hamilton by and Through Hamilton v. VadenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- George v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- English v. T. H. Rogers Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Amsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.