Legal Opinion

English v. T. H. Rogers Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1918No. 7642PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee-County; B. P. De Gra-ffenried, Judge. Action by the T. H. Bogers Lumber Company against Bessie E. English and Tupper & Bird, a copartnership, composed of H. E. Tupper and E. V. Bird, defendants. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Bessie E. English and A. Z. English and W. C. Cook, sureties, bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSbcabp, C. J.

On July 7, 1911, the T. H. Bogers Lumber Company commenced an action against Bessie E. English to recover judgment in the sum of $1,636.65 on account of certain lumber and building materials sold by the lumber company to Tupper & Bird, contractors, and to foreclose a lien on lot 1 in block 56 in the city of Muskogee, owned by defendant. The defendant appeared and demurred to the petition on the ground: (1) That the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) there were not sufficient parties defendant. On November 6th foL lowing, the plaintiff appeared and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. GoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Richards v. Maryland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1814
  4. McWhirt v. MckeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. Denton v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Artis v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SwydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hamilton by and Through Hamilton v. VadenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Jackson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API