Legal Opinion

In Re Esate of Cudworth

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1901No. S.F. Nos. 2578, 2579PublishedCited by 37 opinions

APPEALS from a decree settling the final account of an executor and from a decree distributing the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The two appeals taken to this court in In the Matter of the Estate of Cudworth, Deceased, may be considered together. Both are prosecuted by the son, a devisee under the will. The one is from that part of the decree settling the final account of the executor, wherein he is allowed full commissions upon the amount of the estate accounted for by him. The other is from that part of the decree of final distribution which adjudges certain property left by the deceased to be community property, instead of separate property, and distributes it accordingly.

1. The estate of deceased consisted of real…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API