Estate of Gold
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. G. W. Dinkelspiel, John R. Jones, and W. B. Beaizley, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This was a proceeding under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine the heirship of the estate of Henry L. Gold, deceased, and the several rights and interests therein of the persons claiming to inherit the same.
The appeal was from the entire judgment, hut in pursuance of a stipulation of the parties, the appeal was dismissed as to that part of the judgment determining heirship and adjudging certain of the property to he the separate property of Gold. The sole question presented is whether or not the decision of the court below is correct, in so far as it declared that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by46 opinions
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Laughlin v. LaughlinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.