Legal Opinion

Estate of Rattray

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1939No. L. A. 16529PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal from an order of partial distribution made and entered in the estate of Elizabeth Rattray, deceased. The contest is between the relatives of said Elizabeth Rattray and relatives of James Rattray, the predeceased husband of the said Elizabeth Rattray. By said decree of distribution, certain property in the estate of Elizabeth Rattray, deceased, was distributed in equal shares, that is to say, one-half thereof was distributed to relatives of Elizabeth Rattray, and one-half thereof to the relatives of James Rattray. The relatives of Elizabeth Rattray entitled to share in her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In Re Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Estate of McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re Estate of PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re the Estate of McArthorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Randall v. Department of InstitutionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Estate of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Estate of TaitmeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API