Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Earmark, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 16, 1997No. 3:96cv190 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. #23]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff Francis Gorman was employed by the Defendant as a vice-president from November, 1986, until his termination by the Defendant Gerald Bloom on October 12, 1994. The Bloom and Gorman families had been friends, and when Bloom purchased Earmark in 1986, he asked Gorman to join him as the second-in-command. Gorman has a college degree in history, and over the course of his business experience he has taken classes in financial management and personnel relations. His previous employment experience…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,847 National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Chris M. Turtur and Stephen P. Turtur, D/B/A C & S Joint Venture, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Mario Turtur, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fortino v. Quasar Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Martino-Catt v. EI duPont Nemours and Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
- Sedotto v. Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- R & I Trading of New York, Inc. v. Executive Aircraft Interiors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022