Legal Opinion
State v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 13, 1989No. 13600PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiffs, the state of Connecticut and the state teachers retirement board (board), appealed to the Appellate Court from a judgment of the Superior Court upholding an order of the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (CHRO) awarding the defendant Paul B. Kirkland an increase in his future pension benefits. We transferred the case to ourselves pursuant to Practice Book § 4023. We find error in part and remand the case to the trial court to modify the judgment in accordance with this opinion.
The facts are not disputed. Kirkland retired from his teaching position in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Brittell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Craine v. Trinity CollegeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.