Legal Opinion
Sedotto v. Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 8, 2000No. 3:98CV1672 GLGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jane Sedotto, has brought this employment discrimination suit pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., (“Title VII”), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., (“ADEA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended by the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 203 (“EPA”), and Connecticut’s Fair Employment Practices Act, C.G.S.A. § 46a-60(a) et seq. (“CFE-PA”). Plaintiff alleges that her employer, Borg-Warner Protective Services Corporation, d/b/a Burns International…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Elliot v. Avangrid Management CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025