Legal Opinion

Fortino v. Quasar Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1991No. Nos. 91-1123, 91-1197 and 91-1564PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

This suit charges the American subsidiary of a Japanese company with discriminating against its American executives on the basis of their age and national origin, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 626(b), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., respectively. A jury and judge (only the age claim was triable to a jury, since Title VII authorizes only equitable relief) awarded the three plaintiffs — John Fortino, Carl Meyers, and F. William Schulz, all former executives of Quasar Company, an…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. James E. Rodgers v. Western-Southern Life Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Nicholas A. CHIARAMONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FASHION BED GROUP, INC., a DIVISION OF LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Robert WALLACE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMC PNEUMATICS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Edsel Gusman, Cross-Appellant v. Unisys Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API