Wolfson v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellants, the Wolfson and Segal families, succeeded in an inverse condemnation action against respondent City of St. Paul, and then successfully defended against the city’s new trial motion and appeal. Following resolution of the appeal, appellants moved in district court for reimbursement of litigation expenses associated with the posttrial hearing and appeal. The district court denied the motion, concluding that appellate litigation expenses are not reimbursable under Minn. Stat. § 117.045 (1994). Because we conclude that federal law controls this issue and that 42…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Wolfson v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Johnson v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012