Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1997No. C6-96-1636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants, the Wolfson and Segal families, succeeded in an inverse condemnation action against respondent City of St. Paul, and then successfully defended against the city’s new trial motion and appeal. Following resolution of the appeal, appellants moved in district court for reimbursement of litigation expenses associated with the posttrial hearing and appeal. The district court denied the motion, concluding that appellate litigation expenses are not reimbursable under Minn. Stat. § 117.045 (1994). Because we conclude that federal law controls this issue and that 42…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Wolfson v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Johnson v. City of ShorewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API