Legal Opinion
Johnson v. City of Shorewood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1995No. CX-94-2056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellants Ronald R. Johnson, et ah, moved the district court for costs and attorney fees incurred on an earlier appeal. The district court denied the motion. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent City of Shorewood (city) constructed a flood control pond and related structure. Because the pond spread onto appellants’ property during high water, appellants petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel inverse condemnation proceedings.
After a hearing, the district court issued the writ. It also awarded appellants attorney fees, costs, and expenses pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 117.045 (1992).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Concrete Units, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Wolfson v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997