Karl v. C. A. Reed Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
Following the rendition of a jury verdict and the entry of a judgment for the defendant in a wrongful death action, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground that it erred in refusing to instruct the jury of the duty of a motorist to stop at the scene of an accident and render aid to persons injured in the accident. (Veh. Code, §§20001, 20003.) During trial the court had ruled outside the jury’s presence that evidence regarding failure to stop and render aid could not be introduced since violation of the statute had not been raised as an issue in the complaint or the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Summers v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moser v. RatinoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. CornersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Peterson v. HenningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.