Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co.
California Supreme Court
Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and Wm. C. Wetherbee for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. pro tem. *
These two actions, which have been consolidated for trial and appeal, arise from a collision between a truck driven by one of the defendants and an ambulance driven by decedent, who died as a result of injuries sustained in the accident. In one action, Mrs. Gallup, the mother of decedent, seeks recovery for his death, and, in the other, L. B. Brown, the owner of the ambulance, undertakes to recover damages for harm done to that vehicle. Defendants in both actions are the driver of the truck, two corporations which employed him, and another corporation which owned the truck.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Tossman v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Fitch v. Select Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Lydia Williams v. Delano DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- City of MacOn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.