Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1970No. Civ. 35503PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALARCON, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner seeks to restrain respondent court from proceeding against him upon an information charging him with violating the “hit and run” provisions of Vehicle Code, section 20001.
The accident giving rise to the charges 2 occurred on May 19, 1969. Following the preliminary hearing, defendant was held to answer. He entered a plea of not guilty to the information and trial was set for October 14, 1969. On the latter date, on defendant’s motion, the court allowed withdrawal of the not guilty plea. Upon the filing of a first amended information on October 14, 1969,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cerezo v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. CornersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. Superior Court (Kaufman)California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.