Legal Opinion

Summers v. Dominguez

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1938No. Civ. 5961PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Plaintiff, while walking in a general northerly direction along the main highway from Patterson toward Westley and on the easterly or right of the pavement, was struck and very severely injured by a truck owned and driven by defendant who was also traveling in a northerly direction along the same highway.

The amended complaint alleges two canses of action. The first cause sets out that plaintiff was a minor; that while plaintiff was walking along the state highway between Patterson and Westley, defendant so negligently operated his truck as to strike plaintiff, causing injury. The second cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tanforan v. TanforanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Potvin v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. KanaywerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Gioldi v. SartorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Myers v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Karl v. C. A. Reed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Boyer v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API