Lanterman v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court rendered upon hearing of a writ of review and which judgment affirmed the proceedings and determination of the board of medical examiners of the state, under and by which the certificate and license authorizing petitioner to practice medicine and surgery was revoked.
In the court below, by his petition, appellant set up a very complete record of the evidence and proceedings had before the respondent board. Respondents, not questioning the correctness of the record as there pleaded, objected to the legal sufficiency of the fácts shown.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex parte McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Woods v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.