Legal Opinion

Delise v. Metro-North Railroad

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 20, 2009No. Civ. 3:06CV00428 (AWT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 65) is hereby granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is being granted in favor of the defendant with respect to the FMLA interference claim in Count One (but not the FMLA retaliation claim in that count), Count Three (FELA claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress) and Count Six (common law claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress).

The defendant’s memorandum in support of the instant motion is organized…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulk v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
  2. Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by Administrator, Personal Representative, Kera Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025
  3. Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by Administrator, Personal Representative, Kera Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API