Legal Opinion
Rosario v. JC Penney
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 29, 2006No. Civil Action 3-05CV00550 (JCH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 51]
HALL, District Judge.
Sotero Rosario [“Rosario”] brings an action against his former employer, J.C. Penney [“Penney”]. J.C. Penney moves for summary judgment as to Rosario’s claims for Breach of Implied Contract (Count Six 1 ), Promissory Estoppel (Count Seven), Negligent Misrepresentation (Count Eight), Negligent Supervision (Count Ten), and Assault and Battery (Count Thirteen). 2
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
In a motion for summary judgment, the burden lies on the moving party to establish that there are no genuine issues of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford A/s/o Jt International Holdings, B v. V. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Concord Transportation, Inc., Defendant-Cross-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Javier v. DERINGER-NEY, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008