J. Markham v. Thomas W. Wolf
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
JUDGE WOJCIK
I respectfully dissent. The well-written majority opinion disposing of the parties’ applications for summary relief1 and Respondents’ preliminary objections in the nature of demurrer2 is based upon the premise that direct care workers (DCWs) are employed in “domestic service,” and thus are not “employees” eligible to collectively bargain under Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA).3 However, whether DCWs are employed in “domestic service” is a legal determination that cannot be made at this juncture in the absence of a developed factual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Adams Outdoor Adv., Lp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Smithfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Thw Group, LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.