Legal Opinion
Jubelirer v. Rendell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 19, 2008No. 102 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
Today we are asked to decide whether Article IV, Section 16 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (“Section 16”) 1 permits the Governor, when presented with an appropriation bill, to delete portions of the language defining a specific appropriation without disapproving the funds with which the language is associated. Relying upon this Court’s decision in Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. Barnett, 199 Pa. 161, 48 A. 976 (1901), the Commonwealth Court held that the Governor does not violate Section 16 by vetoing only the language defining an appropriation.…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the ComSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.