Piorek v. DelPonte
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding the suspension of his driver’s license for six months pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly determined that he refused to submit to a chemical test or analysis when he requested that he first be allowed to telephone an attorney pursuant to § 14-227b (b).
General Statutes § 14-227b (f) limits the issues in an administrative license suspension hearing to the following: (1) Did the police officer have probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Kramer v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Altschul v. SalinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Dalmaso v. Department of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Borsella v. Commissioner of Motor Veh., No. Cv 92 034 17 53 (Jun. 27, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Lavoie v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, No. Cv 95 046 85 02 (May 2, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Madigan v. Hadley, Comm. of Motor Vehicles, No. 531303 (Sep. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.