Legal Opinion

Piorek v. DelPonte

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 28, 1992No. 10712PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding the suspension of his driver’s license for six months pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly determined that he refused to submit to a chemical test or analysis when he requested that he first be allowed to telephone an attorney pursuant to § 14-227b (b).

General Statutes § 14-227b (f) limits the issues in an administrative license suspension hearing to the following: (1) Did the police officer have probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Kramer v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Altschul v. SalinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Dalmaso v. Department of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Borsella v. Commissioner of Motor Veh., No. Cv 92 034 17 53 (Jun. 27, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  4. Lavoie v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, No. Cv 95 046 85 02 (May 2, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Madigan v. Hadley, Comm. of Motor Vehicles, No. 531303 (Sep. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API