Legal Opinion
Kramer v. DelPonte
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 5, 1991No. 9557PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On July 21, 1988, the plaintiff was arrested for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. After being transported to the police station, the plaintiff refused to take a urine test but instead offered to submit to a blood test. He was deemed to have refused to take the urine test and was notified by the defendant that his license would be suspended for six months in accordance with § 1.4-227b. *102The plaintiff appealed that decision and a hearing officer upheld the suspension, finding pursuant to the limited determination of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Dalmaso v. Department of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Piorek v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Borsella v. Commissioner of Motor Veh., No. Cv 92 034 17 53 (Jun. 27, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Madigan v. Hadley, Comm. of Motor Vehicles, No. 531303 (Sep. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Magrassi v. Department of Motor Vehicles, No. Cv 920703553 (Mar. 3, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.