Legal Opinion
Brielle v. Zeigler
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 N.J. Super. 352 (1962)
179 A.2d 789
BOROUGH OF BRIELLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT F. ZEIGLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County Court, Law Division.
Decided March 31, 1962.
Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys for defendant-appellant (Mr. Theodore J. Labrecque, Jr., appearing).
Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton, attorneys for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Robert V. Carton, appearing; Mr. Frederick J. Moench, of counsel).
ASCHER, J.C.C.
This is an appeal from the municipal court, which found defendant Robert F. Zeigler guilty of violating Ordinance No.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Moyant v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jefferson v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Mister Softee v. Mayor and Council of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Trombetta v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969