Legal Opinion
Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. Puma
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 N.J. Super. 72 (1969)
251 A.2d 147
SILCO AUTOMATIC VENDING COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK A. PUMA, LICENSE INSPECTOR, CENTRAL LICENSE BUREAU, CITY OF ELIZABETH AND THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. DIERICKX MUSIC, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK A. PUMA, LICENSE INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH AND THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 5, 1969.
Mr. Allan Gutfleish for plaintiff Silco…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Camarco v. City of OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Bonito v. BLOOMFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Silco Automatic Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Kirsch Holding Co. v. BOR. OF MANASQUANNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.