Legal Opinion

Jefferson v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1973No. 1721PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

In their capacity as taxpayers, appellants brought an action in the superior court through which they sought to have Ordinance 29-70 of the City of Anchorage declared void, and to have any payments disbursed under that ordinance declared illegal. The ordinance in question effected a raise in salary of the mayor of Anchorage from $6,000 to $24,000 annually. From a judgment dismissing the action on its merits, appeal is brought. Appellants’ various contentions on appeal may be grouped under three main headings: (1) that Ordinance 29-70 is invalid, (2) that the judgment is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parks v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gilman v. NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Richard v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Coleman v. LouisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Liberati v. Bristol Bay BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. McCormick v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API