State ex rel. Goodsill v. Woodmansee
North Dakota Supreme Court
^JABEAS CORPUS. filed a brief containing points and authorities without argument. Mr. Francis presented the case to the court in an exhaustive oral argument. The points and authorities were as follows: Section 27 of the State Bank Law of 1890 amounts to a palpable and arbitrary interference with the right of personal liberty: People v. Marx, 99 N. Y. 377; in re Jacobs, 98 id. 98; B. Un.
Read the full summary
^JABEAS CORPUS. filed a brief containing points and authorities without argument. Mr. Francis presented the case to the court in an exhaustive oral argument. The points and authorities were as follows: Section 27 of the State Bank Law of 1890 amounts to a palpable and arbitrary interference with the right of personal liberty: People v. Marx, 99 N. Y. 377; in re Jacobs, 98 id. 98; B. Un. Co. v. C. C. Co., Ill U. S. 146; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 id. 356; People v. Common Council, 38 N W. 470; Millett v. People, 117 111. 302 (S. C. 7 N. E. 631;) People v. Gillson, 109 N. Y. 389. Said section is…
1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.
Defendant’s return to the writ shows that the relator is detained in defendant’s custody, as sheriff of Kidder county, by virtue of a certain warrant of commitment for the alleged offense of doing business as an individual banker, contrary to the provisions of § 27 of the act entitled “ An act to provide for the organization and government of state banks.” Chapter 23, Laws of N. Dak. 1890, p. 106. Section 27 of the act reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any individual, firm, or corporation to continue to transact a banking business, or to receive deposits for a period longer than six…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- The People v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
- Pennington v. TownsendNew York Supreme Court · 1831
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.