Legal Opinion
County of Divide v. Baird
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1926PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Plaintiff brings this action to recover the amount of a deposit of county funds in the First State Bank of Wild Rose, and to foreclose a contemporaneous pledge of certain certificates of indebtedness. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Baird, who, as receiver of the First State Bank of Wild Rose,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Oulton v. Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.