State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ Upon the relation of T. E. Dybdal and others the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the State Securities Commission and others to review the order and proceedings of the commission denying the application of relators for a certificate authorizing them to operate a bank at Elbow Lake to be known as the Farmers Service State Bank.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari to the State Securities Commission to review its order denying the application of the relators for a certificate authorizing them to transact business as the Farmers Service State’ Bank at Elbow Lake in Grant county.
1. The statute, hereinafter quoted, was enacted in the exercise of the police power. It intends, in the interest of the public, to insure safe banking. It does not intend to create a monopoly nor to deter private individuals from engaging their activities in banking, except insofar as a proper regulation of banks in the interest of the public has such effect. That the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- State ex rel. Powell v. State Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.