Germain v. Pullman Baptist Church
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.
Does the discovery rule apply to toll the statute of limitation in actions for negligent pastoral counseling and breach of fiduciary duty, when the plaintiffs allegedly did not know that the cause of their psychological injuries was the improper sexual conduct their pastor engaged them in during the course of counseling? The superior court held the discovery rule does not apply in those circumstances, and it summarily dismissed the plaintiffs’ lawsuits against their pastor. It also dismissed the plaintiffs’ actions against their church for negligent supervision of the pastor. The court ruled…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- August v. US BancorpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- August v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- S.H.C. v. Sheng-Yen LuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Erdman v. Chapel Hill Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.