Legal Opinion

Niece v. Elmview Group Home

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1997No. 63596-0PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C.J.

A developmentally disabled woman brought this action for damages against a private group home after she was sexually assaulted by a staff member at the home. We are asked to determine the tort theories under which a group home for developmentally disabled persons may be liable for such assaults. We hold that (1) the special relationship between the group home and its vulnerable residents gives rise to a duty of reasonable care, owed by the group home to its residents, to protect the residents from all foreseeable harms, and (2) sexual assault by a staff member is not a legally unforeseeable…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical CenterTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API