S.H.C. v. Sheng-Yen Lu
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Cox, A.C.J.
— The First Amendment does not provide religious organizations with absolute immunity from liability for tortious conduct.1 If such liability is predicated on secular conduct and does not involve the interpretation of church doctrine or religious beliefs, there is no violation of the Constitution.2 Here, S.H.C. claims that the Ling Shen Ching Tze Temple, Inc., (Temple) is vicariously liable under various theories for alleged sexual acts committed by Grandmaster Sheng-Yen Lu (Grandmaster Lu). He is the *515spiritual leader and founder of the True Buddha religion practiced by followers…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.