Legal Opinion

John Hoagland v. City of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877No. 5225PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, County of Yolo. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case of Green v. Swift, 47 Cal. 537, throws further light on the litigation connected with this matter.

1Opinion of the Court

The District Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint and in entering judgment in favor of the *143defendant, because the act entitled “An Act to enable John Hoagland and others to sue the City of Sacramento,” set out in the complaint upon which this action is founded, is a valid act, founded in manifest equity, and is a legitimate exercise of legislative authority, its purpose being to provide a legal remedy to enable the plaintiff to enforce a just and equitable claim (not before enforceable in the Courts) against a municipal corporation for damage caused by a public…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API