Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1976No. L.A. 30437PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

In this appeal we consider whether a court may take cognizance of a child’s independent income in determining the parent’s obligation of support. We conclude that it may do so, but only in a limited, and restricted sense and that a solvent parent may not entirely discharge his or her support obligation by resort to the child’s independent income.

Plaintiffs, Scott and Marc Armstrong, ages 19 and 16, respectively, at the time of the commencement of this action are the only children born to the marriage, since dissolved, of Henry Armstrong (defendant) and Charmaine…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API