Legal Opinion

Andre v. Morrow

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1984No. 14843PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-Respondent (André) brought an action in California against defendants-appellants (Morrows) contending that the Morrows had committed a fraud on André’s conservatee, Beatrice Morrow. André requested the California court to impose a constructive trust on certain real property located in Idaho, in which the Morrows held legal title and which they had allegedly acquired with the proceeds of the fraud.

On June 13, 1979, while the California case was still pending, André filed a complaint in Idaho County District court based on the identical allegations contained…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HoskinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Yoakum v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API