Legal Opinion
Remington Rand, Inc. v. International Business Machine Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
This is an action originally brought by the plaintiff to rescind a contract entered into between the parties’ predecessors on March 4, 1931. Since the parties are the successors *109to the contract, they will be referred to, in this opinion, as though they were the original signatories thereto.
The plaintiff and defendant each owned certain patents relating to non-manual automatic sorting and tabulating machines. They each do - an intrastate and an interstate business. Disputes arose between them with respect to certain moneys due, and to alleged infringements of the respective patents owned by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Big Top Stores, Inc. v. Ardsley Toy Shoppe, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Leader Theatre Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Pearlstein v. Scudder & GermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.