Legal Opinion
Pearlstein v. Scudder & German
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 1968No. 62 Civ. 1383PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Stanley Pearlstein, institutes this action to recover damages, alleging that defendant, Scudder & German, illegally extended credit to plaintiff in violation of section 7(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (hereinafter SEA), 15 U.S.C. § 78g(c), and Regulation T issued thereunder by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 12 C.F.R. § 220. In addition, plairntiff alleges that defendant’s handling of his account constituted a fraud on plaintiff in violation of section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q (a), and sections…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,390 Stanley S. Pearlstein, and Cross-Appellant v. Scudder & German, a Partnership, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Bowman v. HartigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes v. BurchfieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Korn v. Franchard CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Cohen v. Tenney CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.