Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Moule, J.
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether an agreement between two parties which provided that only one of them would operate a scrap metal shredder in the Rochester area is in violation of either the Sherman (US Code, tit 15, § 1 et seq.) or Donnelly (General Business Law, § 340) Acts.
The basis of this action is a written contract made between the plaintiffs, owners of a scrap metal business in Rochester, and defendant which is also in the same business. Both parties purchased and processed scrap metal and resold the processed scrap to steel mills…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Atlantic-Inland, Inc. v. Town of UnionNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Kick v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.