Legal Opinion
Leader Theatre Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.
This is an action for an injunction.. The theory of the complaint of the plaintiff Leader Theatre Corporation (hereinafter called “ Leader ”) is that the defendants Rand-force Amusement Corporation (hereinafter called “ Rand-force ”) and Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (hereinafter called “ Fox ”) entered into conspiracy to restrain trade and competition in violation of section 340 of the General Business Law of this State commonly known as the Donnelly Antitrust Act, and section 580 of the Penal Law.
Leader and Randforce are moving picture exhibitors who operate theatres in the borough…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olstad v. Microsoft CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- R. E. Spriggs Co. v. Adolph Coors Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- State v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. Sterling Theatres Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Mayer Bros. Poultry Farms v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.