Legal Opinion

Compensation of Hatfield v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1980No. WCB No. 78-9439, CA 15467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Claimant appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Board’s denial of his claim. The issue is whether claimant proved that his back strain arose out of and in the course of his employment.1 We conclude that he did not and thus affirm.

Claimant was not able to identify the precise source of his back problems. On August 14,1978 he jarred his back and neck at work when he backed a truck into something projecting above an unfinished road surface. He was free of back symptoms for about the next two weeks.

Dining the balance of August and early September claimant, a cement mason, was constructing curbs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Foley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Landauer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Volk v. Birdseye DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Westmoreland v. Iowa Beef ProcessorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API