Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morrison v. Burlington Industries

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 114Published

1DissentJustice Exum

Believing that the majority has misunderstood the evidence and refused to recognize the appropriate legal principles which govern this case, I dissent. The Court of Appeals’ majority reached the right result and I vote to affirm its decision that Mrs. Morrison is entitled to an award for total incapacity for work.

The evidence, properly understood, shows that although Mrs. Morrison suffered from several physical infirmities unrelatéd to her job1 before the onset of her chronic obstructive lung disease (hereinafter “lung disease”), none of these infirmities standing alone had ever kept her from…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API