Matter of Helman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission has charged Respondent Michael J. Helman, in a complaint for disciplinary action, with violating several provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. The Commission and Respondent have tendered for this Court’s approval their Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, therein acknowledging that Respondent has engaged in misconduct, and agreeing that a public reprimand is an appropriate disciplinary measure for said misconduct. Respondent has submitted an affida vit, as contemplated by…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of CawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of RoemerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- In Matter of MatzIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of MartenetIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of ThonertIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of BehrmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of CherryIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.