Legal Opinion

Matter of Behrmann

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1996No. 49S00-9501-DI-004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The respondent, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in this state in 1977, has been charged by the Disciplinary Commission with violating Rule 8.4(b) and (c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. Following the filing of a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action, this Court appointed a hearing officer pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(e), who proceeded to conduct an evi-dentiary hearing and who now reports her findings and legal conclusions to this Court. Neither party has chosen to petition. this Court for review…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Matter of Stover-PockIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of OrtizIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Matter of HelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Matter of CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In the Matter of Dwayne M. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In the Matter of James Michael KummererIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In the Matter of James Michael KummererIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API