In Matter of Matz

This case is before us on a conditional agreement tendered by the parties for this Court's approval. 'It emanates from a complaint for disciplinary action filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission charging the Respondent with engaging in conflict of interest in violation of Disciplinary Rules 4-101(B)(8), 5-105(A) and (C) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Low and Rules 1.7(a) and (b) and 1.8(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct which superseded said Code.

We find, in accordance with such agreement, that the Respondent, Edward W. Matz, is an…